Friday, February 18, 2011

ARCANE ARGUMENTS



Stability of nature Vs Rights of animals
Being at the highest level of evolution, humans gifted with intelligence is currently  ruling the earth. And humans have taken it as their responsibility to maintain the stability of nature not just in the name of obligation to nature  but with the future in view. As a result we hear of conservation of endangered species.
It just passed through my ear without making any impact until I happened to be at the Zoo at Trivandrum.
Conservation for whose sake?How do a tiger benefit by having its family or genus conserved?The answer would be for the sake of entire nature,as the food chain would be affected.What caused this imbalance in food-chain?The thoughtless activities of humans.And the conservationists  admit with regret and with some pride that now they are correcting by conserving. In this name the hapless animals that happens to be caught spend their lifetime behind the bars.They are given food and water and some lucky animals even get an acre of land for themselves.But just a question-given all these facilities and the intelligence to end ones life what would you choose?Suppose after a 10000 years you gets caught by your successors far different from humans and if they treat you similarly what would be your reaction?And what if they force breed you?Is nature more important that freedom of its children?It is better to be short-sighted and compassionate that to be an advocate of future.Life is just a matter of moments be it the life of humans or birds.

Life is not a matter of masses.The life of a single individual and a 1000 individuals are  just the same.Future irrespective of its length is of lesser importance than the present moment.True that hierarchy exists in nature.But it is the only option behind nature.And every animal plays the role of predator and prey.Humans being at the highest level is exempted out of the role of prey. Humans may crush ants beneath the feet,but elephants can do the same to humans. Thus in a way nature ensures justice to all.But when humans starts playing the role of rulers of nature this simple rule is shamelessly violated.Just as it is an injustice to experiment on a human being it is an injustice to experiment on an animal.Intelligence and hierarchy may be justification for anything but never for taking away freedom without giving back even companionship.
A single peacocks or tigers freedom is far more important than the conservation of its own genus, the benefits of which, it is even unaware. Freedom is the rule of nature,it is the birth right of animals and humans irrespective of the justification they may produce for denying the unlucky few of the same, is going against nature. Mother Nature would prefer getting destroyed or would device its own methods for self-protection rather than watching her kids being deprived of the basic rights.
(Dharma the bull,now seems to be standing on a single leg).

No comments:

Post a Comment