Sunday, March 13, 2011

A JOURNEY THROUGH TIME

If we had a time machine in hand how far behind in History can we ride to?- To interpret the journey History becomes an insufficient subject. A believer in scientific theories can imagine a journey to the days when the Universe was created. But what beyond that? Perhaps we will have to take the aid of theosophy or philosophy. Starting from Physics, we can watch the formation of universe, then the solar system, sun and the earth-The hot and dense universe which started expansion 13.7 billion years ago and the molecular cloud which collapsed forming sun and solar bodies around..

As earth cools down journey proceeds through geography and Chemistry, with chemical reactions explaining the formation of the first organic molecule. Simultaneously we must watch the drift of the land and locate the one from which our continent got separated- with strips from the two supercontinents Gondwanaland and Laurasia colliding and combining to form the continent of Asia.


With the advent of life, life science comes into play. Life is assumed to have been originated and terminated more than once. But we can trace our history to the microbes that were formed 3.5 billion years ago. Life then proceeds through prokaryotes and eukaryotes .With exterminations occurring in between the complex life proceeded up to Jurassic period which met with a termination 180 million years ago. With the complex animals having left, small mammals still continued their journey getting bigger with the extinction of giant sized sauropsids. Mammals which were of the size less than that of dogs during the dinosaur’s time grew in size up to 17 ton, with the prospect of consuming the food which dinosaurs once consumed. Herbivores grew large first with the plant eating dinosaurs having left. Largest carnivores were comparatively smaller in magnitude. The size of the mammals were gradually leveled off by the limitations in the surface area of the earth.

When we come to this point Jules Verne’s classic work- “A journey to the center of the earth” strikes us a sensible. Although it doesn’t appeal to logic it feeds imagination to think of the extinct animals still existing in an imaginary world underneath the earth’s crust , at least for children and for those adults with a child alive in their mind.


Origin of sex

To trace the origin of sex has always been a hard task before the evolutionists. And it is not without reason that some consider it as a historical accident. If it was an accident why was it maintained over so long a period? Asexual reproduction seems much more cost efficient than sexual reproduction requiring only a single parent without the need of complications associated with generation, maintenance and passing over of the gametes. The process is longer and consumes much more energy. To explain the need of sex evolutionists have suggested four different theories as:

(1.)The Lottery Principle; (2) the Tangled Bank Hypothesis; (3) the Red Queen Hypothesis; and (4) the DNA Repair Hypothesis.

The lottery principle says that organisms need genetic variety in order to enable genes to survive in changing or novel environments. But evolutionists go against this as the global distribution of sex reveals that where environments are stable (such as in the tropics), sexual reproduction is most common. In contrast, in areas where the environment is unstable (such as at high altitudes or in small bodies or water) asexual reproduction is common. According to tangled bank hypothesis sexual reproduction is to prepare the offspring for the complicated world around them. Thus the skills required to survive in different niches can be mixed and passed on. According to this theory it should be the organisms that produce a large number offspring’s and compete with each other, that should go for sexual reproduction. But sex is mostly associated with organisms that produce a few large offspring; whereas organisms producing small offspring frequently engage in parthenogenesis .The red queen hypothesis explains it as “running fast to stay still”. It points to the fact that the probability of organisms becoming extinct bears no relationship to how long they already may have survived. The DNA repair hypothesis explains it as to maintain the germ line even when the somatic cells age and die, ie old people giving birth to young babies. Again mixing of genes serves as a probable defense against mutation, those offspring’s that have inherited the mutated gene may be rejected by nature in due course.

But these theories try to explain the purpose of sex and not the origin of sex.Mark Ridley in his book , “The cooperative gene criticizes sexual reproduction as-“You only have to think of sex to see how absurd it is. The “sexual” method of reading a book would be to buy two copies, rip the pages out, and make a new copy by combining half the pages from one and half from the other, tossing a coin at each page to decide which original to take the page from and which to throw away”.


The primate lineage is thought to go back up to 65 million years ago. Human’s branched off from their ancestor’s from Africa about 5-7 million years ago and Homo sapiens evolved in Africa between 400,000 and 250,000 years ago. Going through chapters in Anthropology we finally reach the subject called History where the ages begin. Stone age began 2.5 million years ago followed by Bronze Age and Iron Age. Then we have the Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Chinese, Indian and Maya civilizations each marked my human progress in social and cultural life. Agriculture began about 10000 years ago, and it started about 8000 years back in India.


The ancient Indian literature of Vedas dates back to the period between 1500-1000 BCE. The oldest parts of Ramayana and Mahabharata dates back to 400BCE . The origin of Hinduism can be traced back to the early Harappan period. But it was rather a collection of beliefs and people worshipped deities of their choice in the early days. It was only later that they started identifying the deities with the God’s of ancient literature and organized their customs accordingly. Unlike the polytheism propagated by Hinduism (and the cultures in Babylonia, Egypt, Greece and Rome) there was simultaneous monotheistic beliefs developing with Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Buddism Confusianism and Taosim was developing side by side. But Hinduism which carries the wisdom of enlightened saints surprises us with its foresight. The Hindu era consists of 4 yugas, Krita Yuga, Treta yuga, Dvapara yuga and Kali yuga. According to Hindu Philosophy life in the universe is created and destroyed once in every 4.1 to 8.2 billion years which is said to be a full day in the life of Brahma. Brahma’s life span is said to be 311 trillion years. A complete yuga cycle is caused by Solar system moving around another star. Although the precision of mathematical calculations can be doubted sure Hinduism which carries in it, the essence of pantheism was not contradicting science. Or to put it correctly modern day scientific discoveries rather support these ancient texts prepared with the power of enlightened minds.

Coming back to our journey through time scale Indian History is marked by immigrations- the most important being that of Aryan’s which is said to have taken place during late Bronze age. Then comes the dynasties of India starting from the Mauryan dynasty which ruled from 323-184BCE, marked by the presence of the only King in world history that gave up conquest after victory, Asoka the great. It was also marked by the presence of Chanakya. Mauryans were followed by the Kushans, then Gupta’s, Pallavas and Chalukyas, and the Vardhana dynasty. In the 10th century Muhammad Ghazzini became the first Muslim ruler to invade India. Followed by Ghori, Slave, Khilji, Tuglaq and Lodhi dynasties. During the Slave dynasty’s reign Delhi Sultanate had the first and last woman at its helm, Razia Begum. She was known to be a good administrator although unaware of the background tricks and games to gain power. The Mughal rule began with Babar defeating Ibrahim Lodhi.

But at this point a sudden realization strikes me, this is the History of North India, since my journey through time is from South India, it is not the Mauryan’s and Mughal’s that I will see but the Satavahana’s to Chola’s, Chera’s and Pandya’s.

What next? Tracing my lineage I should get narrower into my caste, Nair or Malayala Kshatriya. There comes a big list among them. Some who served as Travancore Kings, some warriers, some being secretaries to the Namboodiri land lords. I then try to find out to which of them I belongs….

But how futile it all seems-the knowledge that unfolds in an individual’s attempt to discover oneself. All these long strides of struggle to realize that external division’s and achievements mean nothing to a human being. And that the only responsibility that rests upon a human being is to live up to one’s fullness.Just as the contrasting subjects of Physics and History meets in an individual’s history, a journey from past to future reveals an invisible thread, a thread that connects the unmovable mountains with the flow of life, a thread that connects the living and non-living, a thread that connects the birds and animals, a thread that connects the humankind across the globe, a thread-the miracles of which is poetically called “God”.

My history is not complete without the History of the Universe, without that first microbe which was formed billions of years ago without that first set of apes that detached from their ancestors to develop into human beings. And sitting in India getting narrower is difficult as at each step in tracing our lineage we encounter a question of ethnicity, although it may be a matter of thousands of years.Then I think of my favorite author H.G. Wells. He travelled to future from Europe, meeting the Morlock’s and Eloi’s, the later being the descendants of aristocrats and the former their servants that starts feeding on them in the course of time. The imaginative author could move up to 802741AD from his country. Sure he could not have taken a step further from India.

In front of 2011 there is a future unfolding, a future which reminds us that the present is not a still state, evolution is still in progress, chemical reactions are taking place, continents are drifting, sun is getting hotter, universe is expanding and humankind is too busy to fill themselves with awe for being at this spot of time and space.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Definitions


Once it rained.Then a man sat inside his house & he came to b known as a believer.Another sat out enjoying the rain & he came to be known as an atheist.Another sat out sipping in tea & he came to be known as an agnostic.And finally a man took a drop in hand and called it god-he came to be known as a pantheist.
It was also heard that the the pantheist sprinkled some drops on the believer..

Resolving fundamentalism-A chat with my friend


 (On coming across pieces of this chat once gain I felt that these arguments are relevant although issue is not much new. I request you not to jump into conclusion before reading it completely.)

Prashobh: Are you free?

Me: Not exactly. But I can sense some urgency in that question.

PB: I feel disturbed. I need a chat.

Me: Carry on. 

PB: Ok. Did you read the newspaper today? A professor’s palm was cut.

Me: Yes I read. It was shocking.

I tried to avoid going into details as the adrenaline of debate has the habit of tampering with all other prominent emotions.

PB: Shocking..!! Yes but is your responsibility as a citizen limited to that expression?
Me: What else can I do yaar, with this identity as a student?

PB: For now all what you need to do is to help me out of this dilemma. The place is in my neighborhood. It shook me from head to foot. I feel an urgency to act. I have started 
to hate Muslim’s.

Me: That is a narrow conclusion to arrive at. Fundamentalism as such need to be condemned irrespective of the community from which it arises.


PB: You are washing your hands of the issue by putting forward a generalized conclusion. Do we Hindu’s get irritated by casual comments passed against our God’s? But tell a word against Allah they will cut your throat.


Me: Of course we don’t see much of fundamentalism among the Hindus of Kerala. But that depends of background. Remember the fate of Zakkir Hussain .  Again in Orissa Christian Missionary Graham Staines was burned alive by Hindu fundamentalists.


PB: Painting the God’s naked is going to the extremes. Of Graham Staines, do we Hindu’s go around asking people to get converted to Hinduism?

I couldn’t help laughing at that point.

Me:  From the point of view of a debate in which you intend to win you are correct. But if your aim is progress, that is an absurd point to come forward with. The essence of Hinduism lies in its openness. What makes it unique is that it is the only religion that doesn’t claim to be “the only true religion”. The moments it starts asserting itself it is no longer Hinduism. True that there is a rise of fanaticism among Muslims of Kerala, but there are reasons behind that. Responding to that process will only intensify that. Leave it for the liberals among the Muslim community to resolve. Sufi saints can do a lot under these circumstances.


PB: But still I prefer an India without Muslims.


Me: My dear friend, did  you put in proper thought into that, India-Muslims means, Malayalam cinema- Mammotty, Hindi cinema- Khan’s and Science and technology- Dr A.P.J;  India – Taj Mahal, Red Fort and Qutab Minar, History- Mughals and what can be worse, it means Indian cuisine- Biriyani and Muglai Chicken.
And who knows what your ancestry is about?
If we start subtracting things from India ultimately only the land will remain. Especially we Keralites shouldn’t do that, the reason why we see less dark skinned people in Kerala despite our origin being that of Dravidian’s is the immigration.


(PB paused for a while and I teased him over his snow white complexion).


Me: And during late tenth century there were several Hindu’s who got converted to Islam on account of the rigid caste system.
The west may have its justification for liking and disliking particular religions, but India the land of diversity can never do that.. And all the religions in India follow an Indianized version compared to the rest of the world. And after all, religions are the property of humankind. And as humans we have a genuine right to be proud of the progress made by each of them.


PB: That is really interesting. Religions as the property of humankind- That really calms down that which had been burning inside me. I need to think more over that.etc etc.


Me: And isn’t it nice to watch this diversity- tolerant and truth seeking Hindu’s , brave Christians, rigid yet active Muslims; And one of the reason for the sudden rise in fundamentalism is the failure of the govt to provide a right outlet for this energy.


PB: I see your point there. And it would do some good if there is a platform for discussion on this ground. Now religion is topic that no one dares to tread. Educational system produces children who can earn a living, but doesn’t know how to live their life.


Me: That is a good idea. Indeed during Akbar’s and Shah Jahan’s times there existed such platforms. Why don’t you try that idea in your club?


PB: I should. And thanks da. I feel at ease now.


Me: Will catch up later. Bye


PB: Bye. Tc.


(“Secularism in the Indian context means active opposition to communalism“ ~ Bipin Chandra)




Friday, February 18, 2011

ARCANE ARGUMENTS



Stability of nature Vs Rights of animals
Being at the highest level of evolution, humans gifted with intelligence is currently  ruling the earth. And humans have taken it as their responsibility to maintain the stability of nature not just in the name of obligation to nature  but with the future in view. As a result we hear of conservation of endangered species.
It just passed through my ear without making any impact until I happened to be at the Zoo at Trivandrum.
Conservation for whose sake?How do a tiger benefit by having its family or genus conserved?The answer would be for the sake of entire nature,as the food chain would be affected.What caused this imbalance in food-chain?The thoughtless activities of humans.And the conservationists  admit with regret and with some pride that now they are correcting by conserving. In this name the hapless animals that happens to be caught spend their lifetime behind the bars.They are given food and water and some lucky animals even get an acre of land for themselves.But just a question-given all these facilities and the intelligence to end ones life what would you choose?Suppose after a 10000 years you gets caught by your successors far different from humans and if they treat you similarly what would be your reaction?And what if they force breed you?Is nature more important that freedom of its children?It is better to be short-sighted and compassionate that to be an advocate of future.Life is just a matter of moments be it the life of humans or birds.

Life is not a matter of masses.The life of a single individual and a 1000 individuals are  just the same.Future irrespective of its length is of lesser importance than the present moment.True that hierarchy exists in nature.But it is the only option behind nature.And every animal plays the role of predator and prey.Humans being at the highest level is exempted out of the role of prey. Humans may crush ants beneath the feet,but elephants can do the same to humans. Thus in a way nature ensures justice to all.But when humans starts playing the role of rulers of nature this simple rule is shamelessly violated.Just as it is an injustice to experiment on a human being it is an injustice to experiment on an animal.Intelligence and hierarchy may be justification for anything but never for taking away freedom without giving back even companionship.
A single peacocks or tigers freedom is far more important than the conservation of its own genus, the benefits of which, it is even unaware. Freedom is the rule of nature,it is the birth right of animals and humans irrespective of the justification they may produce for denying the unlucky few of the same, is going against nature. Mother Nature would prefer getting destroyed or would device its own methods for self-protection rather than watching her kids being deprived of the basic rights.
(Dharma the bull,now seems to be standing on a single leg).

IN DEFENSE OF SUICIDE


   As per section 309 of Indian constitution suicide is a punishable offense. It says-"whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offense, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both". Suicide as a law and order question is on the safer side-while killing others can disturb the balance of the society, killing oneself can't. A major argument raised by religion against suicide is that-since birth is not a person’s choice, death should not be self chosen. Ignoring this let us look into the other realities.
   Life is a duration of time during which "I" is valid. It is important that one remains in the state of mind that pleases him/her during this period. Happiness is desired by everyone, although unattainable at times. However it can't be sustained/attained in anarchy-it is from this realization that all the orderliness of society roots. Long- sightedness which extends for a lifetime is often carried further.
  Everything has an end, be it today or tomorrow .Thinking as a human being with a life span of few years, today and tomorrow makes a big difference. But not while thinking as a part of the universe whose origin and end is well beyond human reach. Living based on the fallacy that life is a duty roots from the concept of God-The best example of human creativity. God was not the product of a sudden stroke of imagination. It evolved as a necessity to put the distracted minds at ease-an axiom in the attempt to prove life.
  To explain life one need not jump into the past or future, the simple truth of life is the present seconds-these seconds with the vast potential to unfold ecstasies before us. A life can be said to be meaningful when the majority of the seconds are spent in a pleasant state of mind or in attempts to achieve the same. So when a person feels that future has nothing for him/her, he/she has a birth right to conclude life. Kanu Sanyal-The Naxalete leader ended his life recently and the news was highlighted in newspapers. Any interview explaining his state of mind before death would not have attracted even a 10th of this attention. Suicide is often treated with shock or sympathy. And this is what drives suicide that roots from short-sightedness.
To suicide is not cowardly, it is not bravery as well, it can be a sensible decision at times. At times the child has to be operated out.


  Irrespective of what drives a person to suicide it should not be treated as an offense. Section 309 of IPC gives an impression that Indian constitution is shallow. Existence of such a law will not prevent suicide. And the value of human life is to be upheld by living a life of quality, and not through a law. Law Commission report tabled in RajyaSabha last year recommended the removal of section 309 as it is a hindrance to provide psychological aid to people who attempts suicide. Mental disorders need to be cured. But the desire to bring about emotional stability should not stand in the way of differences in the same aspect. Take the case of Vincent Van Gogh-he suffered from bipolar mental disorder says description. How can one suffer from being oneself?


Once when a lady's husband died, she jumped into his funeral pyre as he was everything to her. Next when another lady's husband who was not everything to her died society pushed her into fire and called it sati. Years later it got reversed. Will the society that drags a woman back from her husband’s funeral pyre ensure her happiness for the rest of her life?  The question of lady's children remains. If they were something big enough to keep her alive she would not have attempted suicide. All living beings are selfish when it comes to matters of life and death.


Just because the heart and kidney of two persons function similarly mind can’t be expected to be. Thoughts can’t be confined to boundaries. The degree of passion varies from person to person and accordingly the definition of life. I don't intent to justify or to promote suicide that results from momentary emotional outbursts. Nor do I say that we should be indifferent to the pain of our fellow beings. Instead it is the opposite that I wish to convey. Life is not an endeavor that is to be accomplished for the sake of some unknown.
It is from out of complexities that simplicities arise. Many people fail to understand the simplicity of life as they fail to get over the complexities. Reluctance to accept suicide as something natural roots from the fear that it will increase its number. But it is the reverse that will happen. By accepting the simplicity of life, it is not anarchy but peace that is going to result.